The
Role Of The Outgoing CEO In The Search Process
By Richard M. King
The announcement of the retirement of a nonprofit chief
executive officer generally signals the beginning of
a state of anxiety in the organization. The apprehension
and foreboding that follows is a natural response and
it illustrates the fact that leadership transition is
never easy, even for organizations that have strong boards
and loyal staff. Especially in the case of a long-tenured
CEO, the dynamics of change at this level often lead
the board to lean heavily on their outgoing executive
to get them through the process of selecting a new leader
as quickly and as painlessly as possible.
In concept, that seems like a reasonable approach. After
all, the outgoing executive has led the vision and direction
of the organization, has the most in-depth organizational
knowledge about the enterprise, has maintained the community
and stakeholder relationships, has the funding and budget
details and has worked closely with the board of directors
in all of this. However, in practice, asking the outgoing
CEO to take primary responsibility for finding his or
her successor is fraught with all kinds of potential
problems and it often results in the next executive failing.
Informed boards of directors realize that the selection
of the chief executive officer is one of the most important
responsibilities of effective governance, one that cannot
be delegated or relegated to others. They also know that
their outgoing CEO can participate in important ways
and at some point in the transition process without usurping
this singular accountability of the board. The question
is, what CEO activities are appropriate and reasonable
during the process without being unintentionally disruptive
or counter-productive to the work of the board?
This question can best be answered through the collective
experiences of the thousands of nonprofits across the
country whose boards have faced leadership transitions.
Kittleman has managed such nonprofit CEO transitions
since 1963 and in so doing we have observed a variety
of scenarios in which the outgoing CEO has participated
in the search process. Drawing on these experiences,
we have compiled a list of Dos and Don’ts for the
CEO’s involvement in hopes that these transitions
can be a easy and painless as possible.
Dos
1) The CEO can support the search committee by providing
contextual data and information on the organization in
a take-stock approach prior to the board launching a
search. Often this is accomplished by the CEO and staff
compiling trend data and results over the term of the
CEO in a retrospective that informs the committee of
where they have been as an organization and where they
may be in the future. While much of this information
may not be new to the board, the intention is to frame
it around the impending leadership transition.
2) The CEO can provide the search committee with a list
of individuals whom he or she believes would be good
sources or leads to qualified candidates for the position.
This might include other local professionals in the field,
colleagues from state or national associations, thought
leaders in the industry served and others who would have
their own networks of contacts in related fields of service.
But, the CEO should stop short of nominating certain
people to the committee as preferred candidates.
3) Due to the uncertainty during the transition, the
CEO should pay close attention to the employee group
dynamics and, in particular, stay in close communication
with senior-level management staff. The period of time
leading up to the board’s selection of a new leader
is often accompanied by behavior changes associated with
leadership transition anxiety. The CEO can help stabilize
the situation if he or she is attentive to such behavior
and thereby prevent board members from being drawn into
any drama at the staff level during the transition.
4) The CEO can play an extremely valuable recruiting
role by meeting privately with the final candidate at
the very end of the search committee’s process.
This is best accomplished sometime before the finalist
goes to the board for ratification. The timing of this
meeting is crucial to a successful conclusion and it
often provides the outgoing and incoming CEOs with an
opportunity to establish the kind of relationship that
will be most productive and helpful after the transition
takes place.
5) In the right situations, the outgoing CEO can provide
an invaluable service to the new CEO by introducing him
or her to a variety of community stakeholders such as
donors, elected officials, civic leaders, other nonprofit
colleagues in the community, etc. However, as well meaning
as he or she may be, the outgoing CEO should not offer
to make such introductions. It should be understood that
it is in the sole discretion of the new CEO to ask the
outgoing CEO to get involved in this way. The board can
support this policy by making sure the outgoing executive
understands it long before the new CEO is selected.
If you follow these suggestions you will be using the
outgoing CEO appropriately and avoid any serious transition
issues. But, even then, you will still face difficulties
if you do not consider the Don’ts. Here are some
of the more important ones.
Don'ts
As you step into the leadership selection process, don’t
ask or allow the outgoing CEO
... to become a member of the search committee. It may
seem like a nice gesture and a fairly practical move
what with all the knowledge he or she would continue
to bring to the table. But this has proven to be problematic,
particularly with candidates who, when interviewing,
will feel uneasy talking openly in front of the board
with the outgoing exec sitting in the room.
... to write the job description, qualifications or candidate
credentials for the new CEO. The leadership requirements
must evolve from the board’s commitment to its
vision and mission and then match their selection of
a new leader with the organizational goals that have
been adopted. The committee should craft the job requirements
only after it understands what the organization will
need in leadership for the future.
... to receive, review or assess candidate resumes for
the search committee. This is a variation on #2 above
and is intended to keep the focus of the selection process
at the committee and board level. It is not uncommon
for the search committee to get the outgoing CEO’s
perspective on the finalist or finalists at the end of
the process, but any input at a point earlier in time
would be unwise.
In addition to the above, and after the board has selected
the new CEO, there are additional don’ts that should
be considered. Don’t ask or allow the outgoing
CEO
... to become a member of the governing board. This
principle should extend to any advisory boards or affiliated
organizations that would put the outgoing executive in
possible compromising situations with the new CEO.
... to work on any consulting or part-time projects
for the organization after the new CEO has begun. There
are rare exceptions to this principle. An outgoing CEO
was asked by the board to write a history of the organization
after she left and this was accomplished without any
problems for the new CEO. Avoiding any potential conflicts
between the new and outgoing CEO is achieved when there
is no overlap in their presence within the organization.
... to talk with employees who come to the outgoing
CEO to talk about the new CEO. The pitfalls in this are
too obvious to even mention. When it happens it can be
disastrous for the organization. The outgoing CEO must
be in absolute agreement with this principle and act
responsibly from the first moment this situation may
arise.
The outgoing CEO can provide an important service to
the search committee during leadership transition but
those activities must be focused on the best interests
of the organization as it looks to its future. Every
situation is different, so it is only through an open
dialogue on this issue between the Board and CEO that
those best interests can be accomplished.
|